These meetings violate the open meeting statute.
More Open Meeting Statute Violations:
Landscaping Contract Rates Were Approved After this Violation:
June 2024 - $42.00 per hour (No Scope of Work)
January 2025 - $47.00 per hour (No Scope of Work)
January 2026 - $48.50 per hour (No Scope of Work)
"ALL" Approved after-the-fact on May 21, 2026
Ratified 5-3-26 Action-in-Leu to move $150,000 from reserves to pay for erosion mitigation projects with NO PLAN and NO Budget
Ratified 5-11-26 Action-in-Lieu to advance $4,532 to the bollard contractor.
Spending more money on a walking trail - This board thinks that the reserve funds are burning a hole in the HOA's pocket.
Found out that we spent: $47,000 on Adding Plants to the Boulevard in 2025 - WHY?
THIS IS ANOTHER WAKE-UP CALL!
The engineering company aims to please.
The process explained at the board's Erosion Informational Meeting on May 1, 2025: (click to listen to the meeting) https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=1194 - We asked John for his opinion on what we have done. Started working in January 2025 and asked John to visit on March 11, 2025. "Does this look like what you expect? Not to put words in your mouth..." For more on erosion mitigation history.
Wait... Shouldn't the engineering company be advising us what to do?
Logic doesn't apply here.😵💫
Drawings?
Budgets?
How about testing approaches prior to spending over $1.1M?
No decisions via rectal extraction by landscapers...
Street seal has gone from $320,000 to $392,152. It was approved. Please, listen to the audio for more details.
Erosion Mitigation Mirage: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=10m3s - all talk, no engineering plan. Does WLB carry the liability or the HOA on the work done?
Entrance Art for The Water Detention Ponds: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=28m22s - The board has a plan and has presented to the County Board of Supervisors, and the community's opinion will not be sought until after the County BOS approves. This makes absolutely no sense!
Street Seal Project: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=29m25s - We have a new cost, not $320,000, but now $392,152. Motion Passed! There are more options than those presented. We can test the new product in one area and run an A/B test. The motion includes plenty of passive-aggressive commentary from a board member on a polite request from an HOA member. Listen to the motion at the end of this section.
Great question treated with ridicule: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=47m23s
Reseeding Project to Help Keep Our Park Brown: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=1h7s - $14,400 (licensed contractor) $10,500 (not licensed) - Motion passed for $10,500.
(Rod) Public Comment on Investment: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=1h7m46s - Great question, Rod! They want to move money into bonds. We moved from CD to MM, now to Bonds.
(Rod) Public Comment on Erosion Mitigation Costs: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=1h10m - Great question, Rod! You have to love the way money is spent without a plan? What is the reason for this? What was the budget? They take this as an offense. Do they have a budget? What is the budget? The slightest thoughtful question, the board attacks... Based on this response alone, I can just imagine how this board would behave dealing with the drama in 2022. What is it that they are doing and why?
The arrogance of this board is out of this world: Erosion mitigation has been studied for years. These studies were used by the 2025 and 2026 boards to get some things done. They should be testing areas, not making major bets on their ideas. Be thankful, not condescending. Erosion is not done. It will never be done. Let's wait until the rains come, and we'll see how permanent the solution is. Don't patronize us! Some of us have done our homework and invested more hours than all of you combined. Others are not able to do their homework. Most of us are wilfully ignorant, but not stupid. It doesn't matter which camp we belong to; our eyes will tell us the truth shortly.
Open meeting where homeowners are prevented from participating... When convenient, use the following approach: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=5m45s
Trico and Comcast Fiber Installation discussion: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=7m5s
Graffiti discussion with the Sheriff's Department: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=9m5s
The Finance Report: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=13m29s - This is not an acceptable finance report, just a drop in the bucket. Why are we putting up with this?
One of the most arrogant, self-serving comments of the meeting. https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=52m37s This board prevents members from providing dissenting comments.
HA5 by Holbrook $320K: https://vimeo.com/1181817300/3fd48837e1?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=32m59s
Mar 13, 2026 09:14 am
Community Clarification: Our HOA and 501(c)(4) Status
Our HOA operating as a 501(c)(4) does not change how our community functions, and it has saved the association a significant amount of money.
Since there has been some discussion again about our HOA being a 501(c)(4), I wanted to provide some clarification for residents. This is simply meant to provide accurate information for the community.
When this was first discussed, I was actually one of the people who had concerns about it. Because of that, I spent a significant amount of time researching what it truly means and how it impacts our community.
While I did not agree with how it was originally presented to the community, as it left a lot of confusion and required me to do more research than I should have had to at the time, the reality is that the 2022 board ultimately saved this community a significant amount of money by applying for the 501(c)(4).
Since then, the topic has been reviewed and discussed across four different boards, and none have found a reason not to continue operating as a 501(c)(4).
At this point, it has been well reviewed and consistently supported as the best financial structure for the association.
A 501(c)(4) is simply a federal tax classification for a nonprofit “social welfare organization.” It does not determine whether property is public or private.
According to the Internal Revenue Service, organizations operating under Section 501(c)(4) must promote the common good and general welfare of the community they serve. The IRS also specifically states:
“Homeowners’ associations by their very nature benefit certain individuals, typically their members.”
In other words, the “community” being referenced is the homeowners who live here and whose dues maintain the neighborhood, not the general public.
This is why HOAs commonly maintain amenities such as:
• Parks
• Greenbelts
• Playgrounds
• Walking paths
These are common areas funded and maintained by homeowners for the benefit of the community.
In Arizona, HOA common areas are also recognized as privately owned property of the association, governed by the community’s CC&Rs and managed under the Arizona Planned Communities Act (A.R.S. Title 33, Chapter 16).
For that reason, it is normal for HOA amenities to have signage such as:
• Private Property
• Residents and Guests Only
• Private Park – HOA Members Only
At the same time, there are practical realities of living in a non-gated community.
From time to time, people do come through the neighborhood to solicit. While communities can try to discourage it, door-to-door solicitation is generally protected under First Amendment rights, which means it cannot always be completely prevented. If residents prefer not to be disturbed, placing a “No Soliciting” sign on your door is often the most effective solution.
We also occasionally see people using the park who may not live here. Because we are not a gated community and do not patrol the park or check IDs, there is realistically no way to completely eliminate that.
What we will take seriously, however, is any damage to HOA property. Anyone who vandalizes or damages community property whether they live here or not will be reported and charges will be pursued.
I would also like to acknowledge and thank the 2022 board treasurer for the work that went into applying for the 501(c)(4), which ultimately helped save this community a significant amount of money.
The bottom line:
Operating as a 501(c)(4) simply allows the association to function as a nonprofit that supports the welfare of our community. It saves the neighborhood money and does not change how our community operates or how residents live here.
The goal of sharing this information is to provide clarity for the community moving forward.
Clarification: Our HOA and 501(c)(4) Status
When this was first discussed, I was actually one of the people who had concerns about it. Because of that, I spent a significant amount of time researching what it truly means and how it impacts our community.
NOTE: During 2022, 10 members were dealing with a serious case of PDS and were attacking the board due to that affliction. The board scheduled and agendized the discussion across numerous meetings and brought experts to answer questions. (Over 8 hours of board meeting time were allocated to this subject matter.) The board was harassed and vilified. Two of these individuals, including the author of this post on TownSq, have since apologized for their abhorrent behavior.
The reality is that the 2022 board ultimately is saving this community a significant amount of money by applying for 501(c)(4) status, and nothing we feared came to pass. Our hysteria was unfounded, and we sincerely apologize for the harm we caused.
The bottom line: the 2022 board was brilliant. Since then, the topic has been reviewed and discussed across four different boards, and none have found a reason not to continue operating as a 501(c)(4).
At this point, it has been well reviewed and consistently supported as the best financial structure for the association. We sincerely apologize for attacking the 2022 Board.
A 501(c)(4) is simply a federal tax-exempt classification for a nonprofit “social welfare organization.” It does not determine whether property is public or private. The property remains private.
According to the Internal Revenue Service, organizations operating under Section 501(c)(4) must promote the common good and general welfare of the community they serve. The IRS also specifically states:
“Homeowners’ associations by their very nature benefit certain individuals, typically their members.”
In other words, the “community” being referenced is the homeowners who live here and whose dues maintain the neighborhood, not the general public.
This is why HOAs commonly maintain amenities such as:
• Parks
• Greenbelts
• Playgrounds
• Walking paths
These are common areas funded and maintained by homeowners for the benefit of the community.
In Arizona, HOA common areas are also recognized as privately owned property of the association, governed by the community’s CC&Rs and managed under the Arizona Planned Communities Act (A.R.S. Title 33, Chapter 16).
For that reason, it is normal for HOA amenities to have signage such as:
• Private Property - Yes
• Residents and Guests Only - Not for a 501(c)(4) (per legal counsel, these signs need to come down)
• Private Park – HOA Members Only - Not for a 501(c)(4) (per legal counsel, these signs need to come down)
People who are not members, guests, and residents have been using the park since the HOA's inception without restriction. Nothing has changed.
At the same time, there are practical realities of living in a non-gated community. We also occasionally see people using the park who may not live here. Because we are not a gated community and do not patrol the park or check IDs, there is realistically no way to completely eliminate that.
What we will take seriously, however, is any damage to HOA property. Anyone who vandalizes or damages community property, whether they live here or not, will be reported and charges will be pursued.
I would like to acknowledge and thank the 2022 board for the work and brilliance that went into applying for the 501(c)(4), which ultimately helped save this community a significant amount of money.
The bottom line:
Operating as a 501(c)(4) simply allows the association to function as a tax-exempt nonprofit that supports the welfare of our broader community. It saves our association money, limits assessment increases, and does not change how our community operates or how residents live here.
NOTE: THE 2022 BOARD THANKS YOU FOR YOUR APOLOGIES AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF OUR WORK.
This has nothing to do with the 501(c)(4) designation:
From time to time, people do come through the neighborhood to solicit. While communities can try to discourage it, door-to-door solicitation is generally protected under First Amendment rights, which means it cannot always be completely prevented. If residents prefer not to be disturbed, placing a “No Soliciting” sign on your door is often the most effective solution.