These meetings violate the open meeting statute.
Ask yourselves:
Why are homeowners requesting records from the HOA?
Perhaps it's because what they are being told doesn't seem to align with what they have observed or experienced. Requesting records is a legitimate way for members to verify information, understand how decisions are being made, and ensure that the association is operating transparently.
The homeowners asking these questions may ultimately be protecting the interests, rights, and assets of every member of the community, including yours.
Instead of attacking those who ask questions or exercise their statutory rights, consider directing those questions to the Board. Transparency should welcome inquiry, not discourage it.
The question in the infographic below should help you understand where we are coming from. Every board since our inception and every other HOA run by a competent board would have all of these answers on the record. Does our current board have the answers? Don't trust us... Ask.
More Arizona Statute Violations.
Update from meeting:
All three policies were approved... Violations and all. (Two HOA attorneys paid well... Two different opinions. I wonder why we have them around.)
In all honesty, I continue to be surprised and disappointed by the way our board meetings are conducted.
During last night's meeting, multiple personal attacks were made against Peter. One attendee repeatedly corrected and challenged him in a personal manner, while another escalated the situation by threatening him and inviting him to "go out to the parking lot" for what amounted to a high-school-style confrontation.
The responsibility for maintaining order during the meeting rests with the presiding officer. Personal attacks should not be permitted. When they do occur, they should be stopped immediately, and the person who was targeted should be given a reasonable opportunity to respond rather than being expected to simply absorb the abuse. A person has the right to defend themselves.
Unfortunately, the discussion did not end with the meeting. Today, social media is filled with additional attacks against Peter and the homeowner who filed the complaint with the Arizona Department of Real Estate.
For those commenting online who were not present at the meeting, I would encourage you to reserve judgment until you have watched the meeting recording. Hearing events firsthand provides far better context than relying on secondhand accounts or social media commentary.
Ask yourselves, why are people asking for records from the HOA? Maybe because what we are being told does not square with reality. They may be protecting your rights and assets, and you're bashing them. Please stop the attacks and start asking the board questions.
Introducing a new vendor https://navecta.com/products/hoalibrary - The owner's name is John Calvo. The LLC was formed on January 19, 2026, and we are their first customer. (Sounds familiar, doesn't it?) This is why John offered to give us the service for two months free. Three of the four board members voted for this contract.
As for the election records request, even though one of them had requested and received access to the 2022 vote. In his opinion, no one else should have the same right. Maybe... It's time to start testing with ADRE filings.
New amenity proposed. Children's sandbox. If the money is in the bank, might as well use it.
A violation challenge (ADRE) has been filed with the Arizona Department of Real Estate against the board. More of these need to be filed to get Members to pay attention to what is going on. A big thanks to the member who filed it.
Water usage was over budget by $1,500. (What a big surprise.)
Erosion mitigation will be done by the end of this year. (Sure dream on...)
How many of you are speaking up against posts like these?
The homeowner who filed the complaint with the Arizona Department of Real Estate has the legal right to do so. Whether you ultimately agree with the complaint or not, there is substantial documentation available, including on this website, regarding concerns about compliance with Arizona's open meeting requirements.
Some homeowners who disagree with the Board are not attacking the individuals serving on it. They are questioning the Board's actions and whether those actions comply with Arizona's nonprofit and planned community statutes. Those laws exist to protect all members by promoting transparency, fairness, and accountability. Board members have a fiduciary duty to follow them and to treat members fairly and reasonably.
If you disagree with someone who holds a different perspective, ask questions before making assumptions. You may discover that they are acting in good faith, are willing to have respectful conversations, and are not trying to "get" the Board. Their goal may simply be to ensure that the Association follows its governing documents and the law while protecting the rights of every homeowner.
Healthy communities are built through respectful dialogue, thoughtful questions, and a willingness to examine the facts, not through personal attacks or attempts to silence differing viewpoints.
Why file an ADRE Complaint?
Please review the infographic below. ⬇️ Something that should have taken 10 business days to post on TownSq for all homeowners took 239 days, with at least 5 lies between. Here, but only one reason for that complaint. Unfortunately, the homeowner was not made aware of this clear violation before filing it.
If you wish to find out why? Understand the governance of non-profit planned communities. See... Governance
Suggest that you consider the following:
Attend the meetings and/or view the meeting recordings
If you need ADA accommodations, ask for them
Review the meeting agendas
Review the meeting minutes
Review the monthly financial statements
Review the budget
Ask questions about what you wish to be clarified
We support the member(s) who filed the ADRE complaint and confirm that we will file numerous other complaints until the board changes its ways or resigns. We are tired of their abuse.
👻⬆️Turning on your friends?
Please pick... Casting stones in a glass house. Pot calling the kettle black. Thanks for the free rent deal.
More Open Meeting Statute Violations:
At least 10 violations with between-meeting decisions without an agenda and without a public meeting.
Due to the fact that it is difficult (by design) to pull money out of a reserve account, the board opened a new checking account to make it easier to waste our money. We are now getting close to $1.4 million dollars of reserves spent in less than two years. Checking account today... Your pocket tomorrow.
Monument design $1,700. Action-in-Lieu of a meeting is to be used only for emergency action. This task was not an emergency. This is part of the $25,000 waste.
Continued:
5 Bollars stolen. This kind of thing didn't happen before the community allowed it in 2022. People knew who vandalized and stole property and said nothing. Now the same people complain. Hypocrisy on full display.
Racing to make decisions and not getting permits from Pinal County. Then, meeting with County Staff before they discussed projects and approved a plan with the Homeowners present. (Basically, who cares about statutes and process?)
Member of the County Board of Supervisors - Stating, I had nothing to do with this.
MORE WAKE-UP CALLS!
Unfortunately, the board has decided not to allow embedding of the meeting video. For this reason, you will be directed to Vimeo in a new tab. Bounce between the tabs to get the information.
More Open Meeting Statute Violations:
At least 10 violations with between-meeting decisions without an agenda and without a public meeting.
Due to the fact that it is difficult (by design) to pull money out of a reserve account, the board opened a new checking account to make it easier to waste our money. We are now getting close to $1.4 million dollars of reserves spent in less than two years. Checking account today... Your pocket tomorrow.
Monument design $1,700. Action-in-Lieu of a meeting is to be used only for emergency action. This task was not an emergency. This is part of the $25,000 waste.
5 Bollars stolen. This kind of thing didn't happen before the community allowed it in 2022. People knew who vandalized and stole property and said nothing. Now the same people complain. Hypocrisy on full display.
Racing to make decisions and not getting permits from Pinal County. Then, meeting with County Staff before they discussed projects and approved a plan with the Homeowners present. (Basically, who cares about statutes and process?)
Member of the County Board of Supervisors - Stating, I had nothing to do with this.
The board is complaining about $1,500 ($250 per month) being spent on HOA Member record requests. To minimize costs, they are asking us to visit our management company to review the records in person. Note: If the board and the management company provided records on TownSq in a timely manner, members would not have to ask.
More Open Meeting Statute Violations:
Landscaping Contract Rates Were Approved After this Violation:
June 2024 - $42.00 per hour (No Scope of Work)
January 2025 - $47.00 per hour (No Scope of Work)
January 2026 - $48.50 per hour (No Scope of Work)
"ALL" Approved after-the-fact on May 21, 2026
Ratified 5-3-26 Action-in-Leu to move $150,000 from reserves to pay for erosion mitigation projects with NO PLAN and NO Budget
Ratified 5-11-26 Action-in-Lieu to advance $4,532 to the bollard contractor.
Spending more money on a walking trail - This board thinks that the reserve funds are burning a hole in the HOA's pocket.
Found out that we spent: $47,000 on Adding Plants to the Boulevard in 2025 - WHY?
THIS IS ANOTHER WAKE-UP CALL!
More Open Meeting Statute Violations:
Landscaping Contract Rates Were Approved After this Violation:
June 2024 - $42.00 per hour (No Scope of Work)
January 2025 - $47.00 per hour (No Scope of Work)
January 2026 - $48.50 per hour (No Scope of Work)
"ALL" Approved after-the-fact on May 21, 2026
Licensed Landscaping Contractors: https://roc.az.gov/before-hire
Ratified 5-3-26 Action-in-Leu to move $150,000 from reserves to pay for erosion mitigation projects with NO PLAN and NO Budget https://vimeo.com/1196197559/d5b06ac97b?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=47m37s
It would be nice to hear about the use of funds and see a plan prior to spending the money: https://vimeo.com/1196197559/d5b06ac97b?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=47m37s This is priceless...
The before and after is not a plan: https://vimeo.com/1196197559/d5b06ac97b?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=51m22s More priceless commentary... The takes offense at our comments. See below what Peter referenced during the meeting. This is what the board had to deal with in 2022.
Ratified 5-11-26 Action-in-Lieu to advance $4,532 to the bollard contractor. Was this really an emergency?
Spending more money on a walking trail - This board thinks that the reserve funds are burning a hole in the HOA's pocket.
Found out that we spent: $47,000 on Adding Plants to the Boulevard in 2025 - WHY?
The year is 2022 - Here's a small example of ten homeowners' abuse of the board of directors. Redacted to cover the identity of the guilty.
Hand gestures, constant interruptions, destruction of 8 meeting signs, vandalism of the president's home with recall signs and paintballs, disrespectful t-shirts, theft of 11 parking signs, invasion of privacy, and much more.
Note that two of you confessed to Peter. He has kept this information from the community and the police to protect our HOA.
The engineering company aims to please.
The process explained at the board's Erosion Informational Meeting on May 1, 2025: (click to listen to the meeting) https://rumble.com/v6svw0j-2025-05-01-erosion-info-meeting.html?start=1194 - We asked John for his opinion on what we have done. Started working in January 2025 and asked John to visit on March 11, 2025. "Does this look like what you expect? Not to put words in your mouth..." For more on erosion mitigation history.
Wait... Shouldn't the engineering company be advising us what to do?
Logic doesn't apply here.😵💫
Drawings?
Budgets?
How about testing approaches prior to spending over $1.1M?
No decisions via rectal extraction by landscapers...
Street seal has gone from $320,000 to $392,152. It was approved. Please, listen to the audio for more details.
Erosion Mitigation Mirage: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=10m3s - all talk, no engineering plan. Does WLB carry the liability or the HOA on the work done?
Entrance Art for The Water Detention Ponds: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=28m22s - The board has a plan and has presented to the County Board of Supervisors, and the community's opinion will not be sought until after the County BOS approves. This makes absolutely no sense!
Street Seal Project: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=29m25s - We have a new cost, not $320,000, but now $392,152. Motion Passed! There are more options than those presented. We can test the new product in one area and run an A/B test. The motion includes plenty of passive-aggressive commentary from a board member on a polite request from an HOA member. Listen to the motion at the end of this section.
Great question treated with ridicule: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=47m23s
Reseeding Project to Help Keep Our Park Brown: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=1h7s - $14,400 (licensed contractor) $10,500 (not licensed) - Motion passed for $10,500.
(Rod) Public Comment on Investment: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=1h7m46s - Great question, Rod! They want to move money into bonds. We moved from CD to MM, now to Bonds.
(Rod) Public Comment on Erosion Mitigation Costs: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=1h10m - Great question, Rod! You have to love the way money is spent without a plan? What is the reason for this? What was the budget? They take this as an offense. Do they have a budget? What is the budget? The slightest thoughtful question, the board attacks... Based on this response alone, I can just imagine how this board would behave dealing with the drama in 2022. What is it that they are doing and why?
The arrogance of this board is out of this world: Erosion mitigation has been studied for years. These studies were used by the 2025 and 2026 boards to get some things done. They should be testing areas, not making major bets on their ideas. Be thankful, not condescending. Erosion is not done. It will never be done. Let's wait until the rains come, and we'll see how permanent the solution is. Don't patronize us! Some of us have done our homework and invested more hours than all of you combined. Others are not able to do their homework. Most of us are wilfully ignorant, but not stupid. It doesn't matter which camp we belong to; our eyes will tell us the truth shortly.
Open meeting where homeowners are prevented from participating... When convenient, use the following approach: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=5m45s
Trico and Comcast Fiber Installation discussion: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=7m5s
Graffiti discussion with the Sheriff's Department: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=9m5s
The Finance Report: https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=13m29s - This is not an acceptable finance report, just a drop in the bucket. Why are we putting up with this?
One of the most arrogant, self-serving comments of the meeting. https://vimeo.com/1190349588/7e538521ec?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=52m37s This board prevents members from providing dissenting comments.
Start of the Presentation for HA5 by Holbrook $320K: https://vimeo.com/1181817300/3fd48837e1?fl=pl&fe=cm#t=32m59s
https://preserveasphalt.com/ HA5 website (This looks as if it is a very good choice. As long as it performs to the standards Holbrook described.)
Weather is only half the question. HA5 is a preservation treatment, not structural rehabilitation.
The City of Buda describes HA5 as best suited for streets generally two to eight years old, with minimal cracking and no pavement failures. Published specifications require potholes, raveled areas, low spots, major cracks, dirt, mud, oil, vegetation and other contaminants to be repaired or removed before application.
HA5 should therefore be postponed when:
The pavement is damp or recently rained upon.
Rain or thunderstorms may occur during application or curing.
The first coat has not fully dried before the second coat.
Significant cracks, potholes, rutting, raveling, or base failure remain unresolved.
Oil-contaminated areas have not been properly addressed.
Traffic will be returned before the material has adequately cured.
Putting HA5 over failing pavement may make the road look uniformly black while leaving the underlying structural problem untouched. Reference Material
The present Catalina forecast is not an especially attractive low-risk installation window. Temperatures are forecast to reach approximately 108–109°F, with an extreme heat warning and chances of afternoon thunderstorms beginning Saturday and continuing through much of the following week.
Extreme heat alone may not violate the HA5 specification, but the combination of extreme temperatures, variable humidity, and recurring afternoon storm chances makes quality control more difficult. Based on the forecast, Saturday through the following week would be a questionable period for scheduling large-scale HA5 work unless the contractor can document a reliable dry curing window.
Before proceeding, the HOA should have the contractor provide:
The current HA5 manufacturer’s technical application specification.
Maximum and minimum allowable air and pavement temperatures.
Required rain-free period before and after each coat.
Required curing time under expected temperature and humidity.
Daily quality-control records showing air temperature, pavement temperature, humidity, application times, and gallons applied.
Written confirmation that the existing pavement condition is suitable for HA5.
The crack-repair, patching, and surface-preparation plan.
The warranty and exclusions for weather-related failure, peeling, or premature wear.
My assessment: HA5 may be a valid product, but peak monsoon is not the best planning window. October would normally provide a much more defensible balance of warm pavement, lower rainfall, lower humidity, and adequate daylight for two-coat application and curing.